Sundays are sometimes sleepless. Then I terribly
miss the dream I always have on Sundays. Instead, I stroll through the memories
of the dream I always have on Sundays. The rocking chair. The coziness of the
room.
“[…] is / […]” is the verse I just about almost
always remember from those dreams that I always have on Sundays. My grandma
would read it from our favorite poem “Generations Against Anti-Dreaming Powers”
by an anonymous hermit poet who dedicated his creation to fervent persistence
in opposing insomnia. The poem from which we love to speak from memory is of
particular relevance for the development of poetic vernacular precisely because
of its capricious way of syntactically challenging the structure of the stanza.
Namely, each line, as is evident from the one quoted from the collection Hey! Why Don’t You Chill the Fuck Out and
Come to Yo Fucking Senses!, ends with the verb, which is the point in a
sentence dramatizing the tension between the subject abandoned at the beginning
of it on the one hand and, on the other, the object strongly emphasized by the
copula at the end of the line preceding the much needed syntactic element.
My grandma reads it with such unbeatable passion
that I experience those strings of words as a playground at which me and my
fellow travelers layer the components of the play the way in which one word
added to the other chimes in a harmonious, interlaced polyphony. Which is only
to say that it is not.
Grandma is incredible…likes to tell me stories about
dreams off generations. Some of them imagine the threat of insomnia in the form
of a movie. It features a street and a bench. Somebody smoking. Exotic sites.
Unlikely cityscapes. Incomprehensible habits, from certain standpoints.
Ah,
history…
When I remember how she tells me about poetry against
anti-dreaming powers, my drift is frequently interrupted by the phone ringing.
Of course, I don’t answer. Instead, I keep strenuously engaging in the
unfolding of our moments of certain sharing. Like this one. When she told me
about a generation who chose performance to be the mode of expression to respond to the anti-dreaming threats. The
scene she finds exemplary of their rebelliousness happens to be the one in
which zillions of denizens imagine their bodies to be their minds to be their
cities to be their homes to be their schools to be their streets to be their
families to be themselves.
Ah,
philosophy…
I can’t make much of those unbelievable instances of
unleashed energies targeted against insomniac powers. All I know is that I can’t
help but immerse myself in the inexplicability of her captivatingly bland
narration and…think! I imagine an
expressive mode that would convey the anxiety of the generation whose radical
measures against anti-dreaming is indulging oneself in the orderly fashion of the
threats. I think of a computer game…video game or something…but then, I realize
that I don’t know anything about the aesthetic of games and disqualify it as an
option. Think of a TV show…but it strikes me that I hardly ever watch TV and
can barely invoke a sense of the viewership succumbing to the enchantments of
the announcer’s manipulative gift.
Perhaps a story. In it, the generation is being led
to pursue as healthy a lifestyle as one can possibly afford. Nothing wrong with
it, one would be prone to think. (Grandma would, too. Only, with a lot of
reservation.) Nothing wrong, indeed. Only, the wellness in question is
championed and ensured at the expense of…well, health itself. Namely, harmful
diet, habits, and conduct are not only severely disputed and unreservedly
discouraged, but simply banned. Such injunctions are perceived with maximum
understanding and an awful lot of willingness to accept them as a token of
social concern for the society’s well being. This is, as a result, accompanied
by a strong inclination toward adopting lifestyles legally justified and,
consequently, morally unquestionable. The society’s understanding of social
well being tends to favor control over anything else and, for that reason,
prefers getting rid of the black, grey, red & whadeva markets and replacing
them (certainly, semantically avoiding the ambiguity suggested within this
wording) by legalized, closely monitored, and impeccably manufactured and
distributed goods.
The overarching principle of the sloganeering
politics could be encapsulated within the following thought: “Why smoke tobacco
when you can have a chewable capsule containing 5 grams of an equivalent of a 80%
cocoa chocolate bar!” Synthesized in cutting edge cocoa substitute
laboratories, the powder is the result of a laborious scientific endeavor
gearing towards ever changing patterns of human behavior.
Grandma’s laughing her ass off:
Who would want a caricature of control when
insomniac mechanisms have so much more to offer!
Yeah, right…but would you accept a life of a devotion
to the orderly somnambulism…
Or, you would rather say: Fuck Off losers!
As always, I’d choose the latter.
Same here.
Sometimes I think that deprivation of sleep makes me
love memory of dreams more than I would appreciate the dreams themselves, were
they readily available on a daily basis. Before the very germ of such a thought
starts shyly indicating a possible course of cognitive action, my mind is fully
equipped with a subversive device preventing me from diverting from focusing on
another candidate for the title of the dream-dismantler. The one in question
sorta suggests that sunshine is as elusive as moonlight. Which is only to say
that it is not. And yet, there is a king of thoughts of the kind being
considered saying that even if sunlight is distinct from any other light, it
requires applying uv protection cream. Some realize early on the significance
of such a fact. Others spend a considerable period of time without the faintest
idea of the possibility that it could be more than just recommendable. It normally
takes them twice as much to start entertaining the choices of the cream.
Typically, it is when the contrary manifests itself in the full glory of
wishful thinking: the impossibility whose inevitability one keenly embraces and
whose quirky logic one instantly, whole-heartedly doubts.
No comments:
Post a Comment